Racial Realities in Europe

By T Lothrop Stoddard. DNA map of Europe Appendix by Arthur Kemp. The greatest obstacle to a clear understanding of Europe is the result of a very fundamental misconception. We think of Europe in units of nations, and of those nations as homogenous, and we take to little account of race and race mixtures. That we cannot understand Europe until with know and thoroughly comprehend its racial background is the basis of this absorbing book. It begins with a clear account of the distinction of the various white races in Europe, before moving onto a study of the racial composition of the individual countries, which provides an explanation of their policies. Now updated with a 32 page appendix which is a fully updated DNA map of Europe, compiled by Arthur Kemp from more than 70 scientific papers and studies into an easy-to-read format with charts and tables. This appendix reveals the exact proportions of European—and non-European—DNA in each European nation. Also includes a section on what DNA reveals about the “Khazar-Jewish” theory. This appendix confirms the book’s thesis about racial mixing leading to the destruction of European civilization. “Race is what people physically really are; Nationality is what people politically think they are.” Cover image: Statue of an athlete, a Roman bronze copy of Greek original of the 4th century B.C. by Lysipp’s school. Inv. No. 5626. Naples, National Archaeological Museum. Contents FOREWORD I. RACIAL REALITIES IN EUROPE II. KINDRED BRITAIN III. THE NORDIC NORTH IV. COMPOSITE FRANCE V. THE MEDITERRANEAN SOUTH VI. ALPINIZED GERMANY VII. DISRUPTED CENTRAL EUROPE VIII. THE ALPINE EAST IX. THE BALKAN FLUX X. THE NEW REALISM OF SCIENCE INDEX MAPS PRESENT DISTRIBUTION OF EUROPEAN RACES PHYSICAL MAP OF EUROPE LANGUAGE MAP OF EUROPE APPENDIX: A DNA SURVEY OF EUROPE by Arthur Kemp P/B 200pp. Click here for details

Sure Beats "Rap" and Dem Bongo Drums....

The Norwegian National Guard parades, Oslo. Enjoy.

New Study of Hallstatt Skulls Sparks Evolutionary Debate

A new study of the famous “Hallstatt skulls” has raised renewed questions about evolutionary change, according to Evolution magazine.

Quoting a study completed by researchers at the Universities of Manchester and Barcelona, the magazine reported that the evidence indicated that “the human skull is highly integrated, meaning variation in one part of the skull is linked to changes throughout the skull.”

The researchers examined 390 skulls from the Austrian town of Hallstatt, part of a famous collection kept in the local Catholic Church ossuary. A somewhat bizarre local tradition has developed there that the remains of the town's buried dead are exhumed to make space for more recent burials.

The skulls are also decorated with paintings and, crucially, bear the name of the deceased.

The Barcelona team made measurements of the skulls and collected genealogical data from the church's records of births, marriages and deaths, allowing them to investigate the inheritance of skull shape.

The team tested whether certain parts of the skull – the face, the cranial base and the skull vault or brain case – changed independently, as anthropologists have always believed, or were in some way linked.

The scientists simulated the shift of the foramen magnum (where the spinal cord enters the skull) associated with upright walking; the retraction of the face, thought to be linked to language development and perhaps chewing; and the expansion and rounding of the top of the skull, associated with brain expansion.

They found that, rather than being separate evolutionary events, changes in one part of the brain would facilitate and even drive changes in the other parts.

"We found that genetic variation in the skull is highly integrated, so if selection were to favour a shape change in a particular part of the skull, there would be a response involving changes throughout the skull," Dr Chris Klingenberg, from Manchester's Faculty of Life Sciences was quoted as saying.

“We were able to use the genetic information to simulate what would happen if selection were to favour particular shape changes in the skull. As those changes, we used the key features that are derived in humans, by comparison with our ancestors: the shift of the foramen magnum associated with the transition to bipedal posture, the retraction of the face, the flexion of the cranial base, and, finally, the expansion of the braincase.

"As much as possible, we simulated each of these changes as a localised shape change limited to a small region of the skull. For each of the simulations, we obtained a predicted response that included not only the change we selected for, but also all the others. All those features of the skull tended to change as a whole package.

“This means that, in evolutionary history, any of the changes may have facilitated the evolution of the others."

Lead author Dr Neus Martínez-Abadías, from the University of Barcelona, added: "This study has important implications for inferences on human evolution and suggests the need for a reinterpretation of the evolutionary scenarios of the skull in modern humans."

Source: Martínez-Abadías, N.; Esparza, M.; Sjövold, T.; González-José,

R.; Santos, M.; Hernàndez, M.; Klingenberg,C.P. "Pervasive genetic integration directs the evolution of human skullshape". Evolution, November 2011.

No Truth to the Rumours!

It was today brought to my attention that ill-informed speculation on an internet forum has claimed that I am part of some organisation which is planning to launch a new party in Britain in the New Year.
Just for the record, this is totally false.
I am not a member of any party, and have no intention of starting any new party, anywhere, anytime.
The original source for these rumours -- the Brent Group website--have been contacted and they have taken down their page which made this allegation. I repeat: there is no truth to this story whatsoever.
May I wish all and sundry a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year....

“MAGNIFICENT . . . VERY CONVINCING” – PROFESSOR J PHILLIPE RUSHTON’S ENDORSEMENT FOR THE CHILDREN OF RA

The world’s leading specialist in altruism, evolutionary psychology and ethnic variations, Dr J Phillipe Rushton, Ph.D., D.Sc., has issued a ringing endorsement for the book The Children of Ra: Artistic, Historical and Genetic Evidence for Ancient White Egypt.

Professor Rushton, also famous for his book Race, Evolution and Behavior, obtained a B.Sc. in psychology from Birkbeck College at the University of London in 1970. In 1973 he received a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics for work on altruism in children. He then moved to the University of Oxford for a one-year post-doc to continue his research on personality development in children.

After that, he returned to Canada where he taught at York University from 1974-1976 and the University of Toronto until 1977. He then moved to the University of Western Ontario where he was made a full professor in 1985. He received a D.Sc. from the University of London in 1992.

Professor Rushton is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the American, British, and Canadian Psychological Associations. In 1988, he was selected as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation.

He has published more than 250 articles and six books, including two on altruism, and one on scientific excellence, and co-authored an introductory psychology textbook. He is a signatory of the opinion piece "Mainstream Science on Intelligence."

The Children of Ra: Artistic, Historical and Genetic Evidence for Ancient White Egypt has been causing uproar in establishment Egyptology circles and amongst “black history” aficionados, as it is the first book for nearly a century devoted exclusively to an analysis of the racial origins of ancient Egypt.

After analyzing artistic, historical and DNA evidence, the book concludes that the founding dynasties of ancient Egypt were of the same racial stock as modern Europeans, and that ancient Egypt collapsed once that society had been overrun by racial aliens.

Professor Rushton’s full endorsement reads as follows:

“A truly magnificent rendition. Fabulous photos plus DNA. Very convincing.”

The Children of Ra: Artistic, Historical, and Genetic Evidence for Ancient White Egypt

This is quite possibly the most personally exciting and interesting book I have ever done. It is something I have wanted to do for, oh, at least 20 years now, but have never had the chance or the data to make its conclusions definitive.

The Children of Ra: Artistic, Historical, and Genetic Evidence for Ancient White Egypt is finally the Eurocentric answer to the Afrocentrist hijacking of ancient Egypt.

This hijacking process has been so complete over the last few decades that even many who mock the “black Egypt” theory, still believe that the ancient Egyptians were some other mysterious race—perhaps an intermediary race between say original Mediterraneans and “something else” (although one can never quite find out what that “something else” is).

I have been collecting fine colour images of ancient Egyptian artefacts, sculptures and mummies for years now, and have built the collection up into one which is fairly convincing and impressive.

Yet the final piece of evidence—DNA testing—was always lacking.

With the “leaking” of the DNA tests on Tutankhamun, however, this final missing piece fell into place.

I have always been meticulous to stick to what the DNA evidence tells us. It is, after all, impartial (even if, as I sometimes suspect, the choice of subjects is unrepresentative, as was the case with the Ainu DNA testing in Japan—but obviously not so in Tutankhamun’s case).

The news that Tutankhamun’s male lineage DNA is western European clinches the case, and at last I have struck out at the Afrocentrists with an overtly Eurocentric retort over ancient Egypt—that it was white in origin.

The book is 81 pages long, and is full colour throughout (hence it is pricey—I have got it printed as cheaply as I could) and contains the following sections:

1. Introduction. This deals with an overview of the competing theories (Euro and Afrocentrist);

2. Timeline of Ancient Egypt. This provides a simple guide to identifying the historical time periods of ancient Egypt, and the major events which led to racial population changes in that country;

3. The Origins of the Ancient Egyptians. This discusses the major theories behind the populating of ancient Egypt, coming out in favour of Sir Matthew Pietrie Flinders’s works;

4. Ginger—the Oldest Mummy. This provides some details on the pre-dynastic Gebelein mummy set, focussing on its most famous member, “Ginger” and his blond-red hair;

5. Statues—the Artistic Evidence. A long section with a number of original paintings, busts, and sculptures which all portray identifiable racial characteristics;

6. Faces of the Dead—Mummies. This section shows how accurate ancient Egyptian artist were in reflecting their subjects, and includes full-colour pictures of the blondest mummies you will ever see;

7. The Nine Bows—the Enemies of Egypt among Tutankhamen’s Treasure

8. Writing on the Wall—Other Races as Portrayed in Egyptian Art. This section overviews the overtly racial images found in Tutankhamun’s tomb artefacts. No punches pulled here on the racial enemies of ancient Egypt;

9. Nubian Pharaohs—the End of Ancient Egypt. There were black pharaohs—right at the end of the ancient Egyptian civilization. The Nubian invasion heralded the downfall and end of that culture and civilization;

10. Carved in Stone—Egyptian Writings about Their Enemies. A nice sample of the work of Professor James Henry Breasted’s translations of ancient Egyptian racial writings (Ostara Publications is preparing a reprint of his full works, for those interested);

11. DNA—the Truth Leaks Out. An overview of the two most important DNA tests done in Egypt, one of the general population which still shows European remnants amongst its highly mixed nature; and of course, the Tutankhamun DNA material. Also included is the skull measurement data from AM Mourant, which confirms the DNA data.

12. Conclusion. This is maybe the most important section, as it outlines what the artistic, historical and DNA evidence tells us: namely that the founders of ancient Egypt were white, but that society became increasingly mixed (or “diverse”) as time went on, until finally they became the mixed-race mass which is present-day Egypt.

The disappearance of the originating white ruling class into this mass caused the end of ancient Egypt.

As the book says: “The Afrocentrist claim that these handful of black pharaohs “proves” that ancient Egypt was African in origin is as false as claiming that the United States of America was founded by blacks because it had a half-black president in 2011.

“The appearance of blacks as pharaohs marks the beginning of the end of ancient Egypt, not its foundation.

“To claim that ancient Egypt was black in origin is tantamount to claiming that the cities of Detroit or Washington DC in the US were founded by blacks “because their present-day populations are majority black and they have black mayors.”

There is also an index.

As I said, this has to be one of the most personally-satisfying books I have ever done. 

The Bomb That Never Could Be Used: South Africa’s Nuclear Weapons

From the new version of March of the Titans, just released:

WHITE SOUTH AFRICA’S NUCLEAR BOMBS—SYMBOLIZES TECHNOLOGICAL ACHIEVEMENT AND FAILURE OF APARTHEID

Possibly the greatest display of white-ruled South Africa’s technological capability came with its development of nuclear weapons.

The casings for South Africa’s nuclear weapons, photographed at the Advena facility, near Pelindaba. Six weapons were completed, and a seventh was under construction when the project was halted.

White South Africa built six atom bombs by 1989 at the Pelindaba nuclear research facility which was to the west of Pretoria.

In 1989, the ruling National Party decided to hand power to black majority rule, but did not wish to see the weapons handed over to either a black government or one of the African National Congresses’ allies such as Libya.

The weapons storage safe, buried deep underground, at the Advena facilty near Pelindaba outside Pretoria. These were the weapon storage lockers used for holding the assembled nuclear weapons.

The nuclear weapons project serves as testament to two important facts about white South Africa.

Firstly, it is yet another proof, if any was needed, of the falsity of the “environmental” theory of development. South Africa did not develop nuclear technology “just because” of its geographic location.

The development was possible because of the race of the people who lived there, and had nothing to do with the geography, climate, or any other factor.

Secondly, the fact that white South Africa developed these weapons for supposed use against its enemies, shows the delusion under which the apartheid leaders lived.

The policy of apartheid guaranteed that white South Africa would inevitably be overrun with blacks, and the possibility of using these weapons in any operational theater was, therefore, nonexistent.

White South Africa’s reliance on black labor meant that no matter where such a weapon might be aimed, whites and blacks alike would be targeted.

The nuclear weapons project stands as a tribute to Afrikaner technological and scientific ability, but was an exercise in political self-delusion, just like apartheid.”

=================

Additional information, not in the book, but which might be of interest to readers:

- The South African nuclear weapons project was publicly acknowledged in March 1993 by then state president F.W. de Klerk. It was only announced after the weaponry had been fully dismantled and the core elements destroyed or removed.

- The United States supplied South Africa with its first supply of Highly Enriched Uranium (HEU) for use at the Safari-1 research reactor, commissioned in 1965 at Pelindaba. The US supplied South Africa with about 100 kilograms of weapon-grade uranium fuel until 1975, when anti-Apartheid sanctions stopped the shipments.

- Apartheid South Africa then turned to Israel for further assistance with its nuclear weapons programme. It is still a matter of debate as to how much technology Israel supplied, but it was probably limited to tools rather than actual weaponry.

- South Africa stated its own HEU enrichment program in a small warehouse in central Pretoria. As it became more sophisticated, larger premises and stricter security were needed, and in the mid-1960s, the project was moved to Pelindaba.

- At the same time, South Africa started developing commercial applications for nuclear power plants, and in 1976, construction was started on the Koeberg nuclear power station to the north of Cape Town. Apart from providing electricity, Koeberg provided plausible deniability for the Pelindada research station.

- In 1970, the South African government announced that it was building the “Y-Plant at Valindaba,” located next door to Pelindaba. The Y-Plant was commissioned in 1974 and started producing HEU in 1978.

- In 1977, South Africa’s Atomic Energy Board (AEB) produced a first full-scale gun-type nuclear device prototype (as opposed to a just a ballistic test device) without an HEU core. This 3 ton bomb, was only meant to demonstrate feasibility of the weapon, and never for actual use.

- In 1973, a group of scientists working at the Sonchem facility in Somerset West, produced the mechanical subsystems for a gun-type nuclear device. They successfully tested their design in May 1974, which proved that a nuclear explosive was feasible.

- The Sonchem success convinced the AEB to upgrade the Pelindaba facility, and by 1977, had constructed a facility in “Building 5000,” and the Sonchem team was transferred to the Pretoria area. In this building, the gun-type device was successfully test-fired using a natural uranium projectile in 1976.

- Several other buildings at Pelindaba were then created for other parts of the weapons project:

  - Building 5000 contained a pulse reactor for the experimental verification of theoretical computer models. In 1979, the reactor was used as a fast critical assembly in an experiment often referred to as "tickling the tail of the dragon" that proved the design of the gun-type device. The reactor was never again used as a pulse reactor and the facility was shut down in the early 1980s.

Building 5000 at Pelindaba, where the "Melba" device was given its "dry run."

  - Building 5100 contained the control room for Building 5000, offices, research and development laboratories and machining facilities for uranium, particularly buildings 5100 and 5200.

  - Building 5200 housed a critical facility to verify separately the multiplication factors of the two parts of a nuclear explosive device, providing confidence that the gun-type design would work. The first nuclear explosive device was also assembled in this building in 1979.

  - Building 5300 was designed exclusively as a laboratory for high explosives. Small quantities of high explosives were pressed and machined into shapes at this facility. 

- By 1977, two test shafts (216 and 385 meters deep) had been drilled at the Vastrap military based outside Upington in the northern Cape’s Kalahari Desert, with the intention of conducting an “instrumented cold test” of the first prototype, using a depleted uranium core. This would have entailed a “dry run” for a real nuclear test. The test date was set for August 1977.

The corrugated iron shed which covers the two test shafts at the Vastrap military base north of Upington. The shed was built in 1987 when Armscor considered reopening the shafts for tests after they had been abandoned ten years earlier following an international outcry.

- The US government was officially — and secretly — informed of the plans to conduct the test. The American government urged the South Africans not to conduct the test, but (allegedly) kept the information to themselves.

- The test plans were only abandoned when a Soviet spy satellite detected the preparations and the Soviets notified the US of the discovery. The US was forced to bring diplomatic pressure to bear as news of the project spread, with the French government threatening to cancel the contract for the Koeberg reactor (which was based upon French designs).

- The Vastrap test site was abandoned, only to be opened again in 1987 when the test shafts were inspected and a corrugated iron shed built over the holes. The test shafts were publicly filled in with concrete in July 1993.

The Vastrap test shafts were filled in with concrete in 1993 under IAEA supervision.

- By 1979, the Y-Plant had produced 55 kilograms of HEU (at 80% enrichment) which was made into a core for a second experimental device named “Melba.” This device was completed in 1980, and used in a “zero-yield test” (in which a nuclear chain reaction is initiated with negligible energy output). “Melba” was then stored in an abandoned coal mine at Witbank at a former military ammunitions depot, until it was moved to the Kentron “Circle” building near Pelindaba.

- By 1979, the state run arms manufacturer, Armscor, was handed control of the project to develop full-blown nuclear devices, with the AEB (now renamed the Atomic Energy Corporation or AEC) providing nuclear materials and development work.

- Armscor built a new facility, the Kentron Circle facility some 15 kilometers east of Pelindaba. The site, later renamed Advena, was commissioned in May 1981.

A side view of the storage facility at the Kentron Circle building, taken when the facility was still in use.

- At the Circle (“Advena”), Armscor extended the nuclear weapons programme from the gun-type weapons to inter-continental ballistic missile (ICBM) systems, and developed advanced warhead designs.

- It was at Advena that cooperation with Israel reached its zenith. Scientists from both countries worked on at least two missiles, codenamed RSA-3 and RSA-4 (RSA= “Republic of South Africa”), both developed from Israel’s Jericho II ICBM. One of the RSA-3 missiles, meant for satellite launch, is today on display at the Swatkorps Air Force museum. The RSA-4 missile could, allegedly, reach any target within a 7,000 kilometer radius while carrying a 700 kilogram nuclear warhead.

The RSA-3 missile, as can be seen at the Swartkops Air Force base museum. According to published data one of the missiles, the RSA-4, would have been capable of delivering a 700 kg nuclear warhead from its South African launch site to any point on earth. The RSA range of missiles were built around the same engines that power Israel's Jericho-II missile and its "Shavit" space launcher. South Africa ended its missile collaboration with Israel in 1992 and then halted all ballistic missile development in mid-1993.

- The first floor of the Circle building had conventional workshops for making mechanical and electrical equipment; storage rooms; uranium casting and machining workshops; a large vault; integration rooms where portions of the devices were assembled; and eight "cells" for testing internal ballistics, propellants, igniters, and small quantities of high explosives for self-destruct mechanisms.

- An explosive test chamber located in one of the cells could handle up to 2.5 kilograms of high explosive. It was also used to conduct plane-wave experiments with shaped charges and to develop high-speed instrumentation for preliminary work on implosion designs. Another cell contained the "pig sty," a wood enclosure where projectile tests were done for the gun-type device.

- The designers put a "plenum" or large room above these cells. In an accident, this room would serve to dissipate the overpressure from an explosion, preventing the collapse of the roof or the walls. Holes at one end of the room would allow the explosion to vent. From the outside, the holes were disguised as ventilation ducts.

- In the early 1980s, the program employed about 100 people, of which only about 40 were directly involved in the weapons program and only 20 actually built the devices. By the time the program was canceled in 1989, the work force had risen to 300, with about half directly involved in weapons work.

A more general view of the Kentron Circle building, taken several years after the facility was closed down. It is empty today.

- The weapons storage facility at Advena consisted of a high-security vault with many smaller vaults inside. Each nuclear device was divided into two sections, a front and back. With the HEU distributed between the two halves, the design minimised the possibility of accidental detonation or unauthorised use.

- A front and back end of a device were never worked on simultaneously. Both ends could leave the vault at the same time only after three top ministers and the head of government inserted their separate sections of the code into the vault. No one person had the complete code.

- - The total mass of a completed device was about one metric ton. It had a diameter of nearly 65 centimeters and was about 1.8 meters long. Each device contained an estimated 55 kilograms of HEU.

- In the mid-1980s, construction was started on a new facility, Advena Central Laboratories, close to the Circle building. This facility was intended to expand nuclear delivery options to ballistic missiles. Construction was completed just as the nuclear program was terminated.

 The Advena Central Laboratories, as they can be seen today. Commissioned to develop the nuclear ICBMs and other advanced weaponry, the facility was completed just as the nuclear weapons project was closed down. 

- The Circle building, and planned new facility, were closed down when the weapons project was abandoned. By September 6, 1991 all of the HEU had been removed from the weapons, melted down, and sent back to the AEC for storage.

- Destruction of the major non-nuclear components of the weapons, detailed design drawings, and photos of components was completed by the end of 1992.

 “Many, if not most, US analysts believe that if South Africa has not declared all HEU produced, the missing material probably was transferred abroad, REDACTED.” -- US State Department's Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), in its now declassified report “Underground Nuclear Facilities, December 9, 1992.”

The redacted part is most likely “to Israel” as there would be no other logical recipient of such material.