Arthur Kemp’s Blog

Some internet sites have reported that the number of babies born to blacks in Paris, France, is now 54%, according to the medical reports of the incidence of drepanocytosis in that country.

These reports are slightly distorted, for a number of reasons, but most importantly are actually an understatement of the true situation.

First of all, it seems that many of these “white nationalist” websites don’t seem to know that drepanocytosis is the fancy name (1) for sickle cell disease, or sickle cell anemia (SCD or SCA), about which I wrote quite a bit in March of the Titans. (2)

Drepanocytosis (from the Greek drepnos, sickle), or sickle cell disease, is a genetically transmitted disease caused by an error in the gene that tells the body how to make hemoglobin. (3)

Sickle cell anemia is not a very rare disease. It is particularly common in populations of African sub-Saharan Africa, with a clear predominance in Equatorial Africa (each year 300 000 African children born with this genetic abnormality), but it also exists in North Africa, Greece, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and India. (4)

In West Africa 2 to 3 percent of all children have a serious sickle-cell anemia and a study in the United States revealed that 33 percent of children observed with sickle-cell disease had mild mental retardation. (5)

Amongst American blacks, America, the prevalence of the disease is approximately 1 in 5,000. The incidence is on the rise and currently about 1 in 500 black births in the USA have sickle-cell anemia. (6)

So what does this all mean?

First of all, it is correct that the incidence of drepanocytosis, or sickle cell, can be taken as a guide to the presence of sub-Saharan African presence.

However, the statistics clearly show that it is only a minority of Africans who have this inherited disease. In other words, if 54% of births in Paris show up with sickle cell, then the actual number of black births in Paris is actually far higher.

Actually, anyone who has been to Paris recently will know this already. The city centre is already majority non-white, and the only reason why there appear to be whites there is because of the large tourist contingent who still flock to the great sights that the city has to offer.

If one ventures outside the city centre in the shockingly awful tenement building areas, the true scale of the demographic disaster is obvious.

Awful, soulless socialist-era modernist concrete block towers, covered in gang graffiti and jam packed with the Third World, confront one for mile after mile. It is a dead, depressing place, and one which is a harbinger of doom not only for France, but all of Western Europe.

It has come to my attention that comments are being left on a number of blogs and forums about current events within the BNP.

All of these comments (on right and left wing blogs) are using my name as   author.

I wish to place it on record that none of these comments are from me and are all fake.

I have a lot to say on current events, and will make them known — but only on this blog and nowhere else.

Everyone is to please disregard all comments being posted in my name elsewhere as false.

With only 34 results still outstanding, Britain faces its first “hung parliament” since 1974 and the next Government — if there is to be one and not a new election in a few month’s time — will be a coalition of at least two of the three big parties, Labour, Liberal Democrat and Conservative.

Ironically, this provides the British National Party (which spectacularly more than tripled its vote from 2005, jumping from 192,746 to a healthy 536,223 in yesterday’s contest) with its best window of opportunity yet.

The kingmaker in any coalition will be the Liberal Democrats under Nick Clegg. Their key demand for participation in a coalition is electoral reform, and in particular the abolition of the current “first-past-the-post” election system.

The reason why the Liberal Democrats oppose the first-past-the-post system is that it clearly puts smaller parties (which is what the Liberal Democrats are) are a hugely unfair disadvantage.

The figures tell the story: yesterday the Liberal Democrats won around 23 percent of the vote, but will end up with only 7 percent of the seats in Parliament.

The BNP, which polled close to a million votes in June 2009, and over half a million yesterday (despite only fighting half of all the available 650 seats), will end up with no seats at all.

In effect, the first-past-the-post system simply throws millions of votes onto the rubbish heap where they are ignored.

As a result, the Liberal Democrats have, in my personal opinion, correctly argued for the introduction of proportional representation (PR) in Britain.

Most European countries already have PR and it works perfectly well.

Under a PR system, if a party gets 10 percent of the votes, it gets 10 percent of the seats in Parliament. If it gets 32 percent of the vote, it gets 32 percent of the seats, and so on.

It is an obviously fairer way of allowing all votes cast in an election be reflected in Parliament.

In fact, a slightly amended system of PR is used in European Parliamentary elections, which allowed the BNP to win its two seats in that body in June 2009.

If the Liberal Democrats are involved in a coalition with either Labour or Conservatives, it is inevitable that they will set the demand for a PR system as one of the preconditions for their cooperation.

In fact, Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg has already made this demand in public – and both Labour and Conservatives have announced their willingness to consider it or at the very least hold a referendum on the topic.

What does this mean for the BNP?

Based on yesterday’s quite impressive vote totals (which imply that if the entire country had been covered with BNP candidates, the party’s vote would be well in excess of a million), the BNP would win in excess of 60 seats in Westminster overnight.

Some of the more perceptive Conservative journalists, such as Norman Tebbit, have already realised this as a possibility.

As the coalition negotiations begin, let those who might feel disappointed at the BNP’s failure to secure a parliamentary seat yesterday, reflect on what might happen in a short while.

The introduction of PR to Britain will dramatically change the face of British politics and propel the BNP into the mainstream political debate for once and for all.