Some internet sites have reported that the number of babies born to blacks in Paris, France, is now 54%, according to the medical reports of the incidence of drepanocytosis in that country.

These reports are slightly distorted, for a number of reasons, but most importantly are actually an understatement of the true situation.

First of all, it seems that many of these “white nationalist” websites don’t seem to know that drepanocytosis is the fancy name (1) for sickle cell disease, or sickle cell anemia (SCD or SCA), about which I wrote quite a bit in March of the Titans. (2)

Drepanocytosis (from the Greek drepnos, sickle), or sickle cell disease, is a genetically transmitted disease caused by an error in the gene that tells the body how to make hemoglobin. (3)

Sickle cell anemia is not a very rare disease. It is particularly common in populations of African sub-Saharan Africa, with a clear predominance in Equatorial Africa (each year 300 000 African children born with this genetic abnormality), but it also exists in North Africa, Greece, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and India. (4)

In West Africa 2 to 3 percent of all children have a serious sickle-cell anemia and a study in the United States revealed that 33 percent of children observed with sickle-cell disease had mild mental retardation. (5)

Amongst American blacks, America, the prevalence of the disease is approximately 1 in 5,000. The incidence is on the rise and currently about 1 in 500 black births in the USA have sickle-cell anemia. (6)

So what does this all mean?

First of all, it is correct that the incidence of drepanocytosis, or sickle cell, can be taken as a guide to the presence of sub-Saharan African presence.

However, the statistics clearly show that it is only a minority of Africans who have this inherited disease. In other words, if 54% of births in Paris show up with sickle cell, then the actual number of black births in Paris is actually far higher.

Actually, anyone who has been to Paris recently will know this already. The city centre is already majority non-white, and the only reason why there appear to be whites there is because of the large tourist contingent who still flock to the great sights that the city has to offer.

If one ventures outside the city centre in the shockingly awful tenement building areas, the true scale of the demographic disaster is obvious.

Awful, soulless socialist-era modernist concrete block towers, covered in gang graffiti and jam packed with the Third World, confront one for mile after mile. It is a dead, depressing place, and one which is a harbinger of doom not only for France, but all of Western Europe.

The DNA test results were inadvertently revealed on a Discovery Channel TV documentary filmed with Hawass’s permission — but it seems as if the Egyptian failed to spot the giveaway part of the documentary which revealed the test results.

Hawass previously announced that he would not release the racial DNA results of Egyptian mummies — obviously because he feared the consequences of such a revelation.

On the Discovery Channel broadcast, which can be seen on the Discovery Channel website here, or if they pull it, on YouTube here, at approximately 1:53 into the video, the camera pans over a printout of DNA test results from King Tut.

Firstly, here is a brief explanation of the results visible in the video. It is a list of what is called Short Tandem Repeats (STRs).

STRs are repeated DNA sequences which are “short repeat units” whose characteristics make them especially suitable for human identification.

These STR values for 17 markers visible in the video are as follows:
DYS 19 – 14 (? not clear)
DYS 385a – 11
DYS 385b – 14
DYS 389i – 13
DYS 389ii – 30
DYS 390 – 24
DYS 391 – 11
DYS 392 – 13
DYS 393 – 13
DYS 437 – 14 (? not clear)
DYS 438 – 12
DYS 439 – 10
DYS 448 – 19
DYS 456 – 15
DYS 458 – 16
DYS 635 – 23
YGATAH4 – 11

What does this mean? Fortunately, a genius by the name of Whit Athey provides the key to this list. Mr Athey is a retired physicist whose working career was primarily at the Food and Drug Administration where he was chief of one of the medical device labs.

Mr Athey received his doctorate in physics and biochemistry at Tufts University, and undergraduate (engineering) and masters (math) degrees at Auburn University. For several years during the 1980s, he also taught one course each semester in the electrical engineering department of the University of Maryland. Besides his interest in genetic genealogy, he is an amateur astronomer and has his own small observatory near his home in Brookeville, MD.

He also runs a very valuable website called the “Haplogroup Predictor” which allows users to input STR data and generate the haplogroup which marks those STR data.

For those who want to know what a haplogroup is, here is a “simple” definition: a haplogroup is a group of similar haplotypes that share a common ancestor with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutation.

Still none the wiser? Damn these scientists.

Ok, let’s try it this way: a haplotype is a combination of multiple specific locations of a gene or DNA sequence on a chromosome.

Haplogroups are assigned letters of the alphabet, and refinements consist of additional number and letter combinations, for example R1b or R1b1. Y-chromosome and mitochondrial DNA haplogroups have different haplogroup designations. In essence, haplogroups give an inisight into ancestral origins dating back thousands of years.

By entering all the STR data inadvertently shown on the Discovery video, a 99.6 percent fit with the R1b haplogroup is revealed.

The significance is, of course, that R1b is the most common Y-chromosome haplogroup in Europe reaching its highest concentrations in Ireland, Scotland, western England and the European Atlantic seaboard — in other words, European through and through.

So much for the Afro-centrists and others who have derided the very obvious northwestern European appearance of a large number of the pharonic mummies. It seems like March of the Titans was right after all…

All of these comments (on right and left wing blogs) are using my name as   author.

I wish to place it on record that none of these comments are from me and are all fake.

I have a lot to say on current events, and will make them known — but only on this blog and nowhere else.

Everyone is to please disregard all comments being posted in my name elsewhere as false.

Ironically, this provides the British National Party (which spectacularly more than tripled its vote from 2005, jumping from 192,746 to a healthy 536,223 in yesterday’s contest) with its best window of opportunity yet.

The kingmaker in any coalition will be the Liberal Democrats under Nick Clegg. Their key demand for participation in a coalition is electoral reform, and in particular the abolition of the current “first-past-the-post” election system.

The reason why the Liberal Democrats oppose the first-past-the-post system is that it clearly puts smaller parties (which is what the Liberal Democrats are) are a hugely unfair disadvantage.

The figures tell the story: yesterday the Liberal Democrats won around 23 percent of the vote, but will end up with only 7 percent of the seats in Parliament.

The BNP, which polled close to a million votes in June 2009, and over half a million yesterday (despite only fighting half of all the available 650 seats), will end up with no seats at all.

In effect, the first-past-the-post system simply throws millions of votes onto the rubbish heap where they are ignored.

As a result, the Liberal Democrats have, in my personal opinion, correctly argued for the introduction of proportional representation (PR) in Britain.

Most European countries already have PR and it works perfectly well.

Under a PR system, if a party gets 10 percent of the votes, it gets 10 percent of the seats in Parliament. If it gets 32 percent of the vote, it gets 32 percent of the seats, and so on.

It is an obviously fairer way of allowing all votes cast in an election be reflected in Parliament.

In fact, a slightly amended system of PR is used in European Parliamentary elections, which allowed the BNP to win its two seats in that body in June 2009.

If the Liberal Democrats are involved in a coalition with either Labour or Conservatives, it is inevitable that they will set the demand for a PR system as one of the preconditions for their cooperation.

In fact, Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg has already made this demand in public – and both Labour and Conservatives have announced their willingness to consider it or at the very least hold a referendum on the topic.

What does this mean for the BNP?

Based on yesterday’s quite impressive vote totals (which imply that if the entire country had been covered with BNP candidates, the party’s vote would be well in excess of a million), the BNP would win in excess of 60 seats in Westminster overnight.

Some of the more perceptive Conservative journalists, such as Norman Tebbit, have already realised this as a possibility.

As the coalition negotiations begin, let those who might feel disappointed at the BNP’s failure to secure a parliamentary seat yesterday, reflect on what might happen in a short while.

The introduction of PR to Britain will dramatically change the face of British politics and propel the BNP into the mainstream political debate for once and for all.

Amidst all the flag waving, salutes, uniforms and bravado, Eugene Terre’Blanche was buried on his farm in a brick and concrete tomb designed to be vandalism resistant — but as the Sun newspaper so vividly revealed, even this tomb was built by black labourers.

Once again, the utter hypocrisy of Apartheid and white supremacism is exposed in a publicly humiliating way.

I can only shake my head.  Don’t the Afrikaners get it?

How can any white people expect to survive in a land where they are the tiny minority and use black people as virtual slave labour (Terre’Blanche paid his farm workers R300 — US $41 or £26  — per month) to do everything?

Terre’Blanche was killed in his bed. I wrote in my book, The Lie of Apartheid, that the definition of a white South African is “someone who would rather be murdered in his bed than make it.”

Afrikaners: The time for white supremacism is gone. You cannot hope to survive while you are so intrinsically entwined with black labour.

You used them for everything, even to murdering you and then digging your grave.

You cannot survive while every single thing you do, every enterprise, every interaction, every aspect of your lives, is determined by your reliance on black labour.

Because, whether you like it or not, black people also have rights, and they have claimed them.

You cannot think that you have a right to rule over black people — you do not.

I’ll say this again, maybe for the last time ever — if Afrikaners are going to survive, they must do two things:

1. Rid themselves of their reliance on black labour;

2. Congregate in an area where they are the majority, and where they do all the work: from road sweeping, rubbish collection and grave digging, to computer engineering and medicine.

Once they have established an area in which they are the majority, and in which they do all the work, then only will they have a fighting chance of survival.

They must do this now; before it is too late.

Stop all this stupid posturing, gun waving and empty threats. Everyone knows that it is meaningless.

If they don’t do that, they are all going to end up like Eugene Terre’Blanche. The only difference might be that the last few will not have their graves built by black labourers.

And if one more person tells me it can’t be done, well then, accept the inevitable.